Open Secrets: Exploring Institutional Spending on Open Access
| dc.contributor.author | Rigby, Miriam | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-31T22:59:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-31T22:59:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-12-20 | |
| dc.description | 21 pages | |
| dc.description.abstract | A robust corpus exists on Open Access (OA) spending within libraries, however there is less literature on assessing OA expenditures across colleges and universities. Due to the nature of the fragmented and uneven investment in OA, researchers are likely not optimizing institutional resources on Article Processing Charges (APCs) as part of the open access environment. This article describes how personnel at University of Oregon Libraries built a Power BI model to encapsulate and visualize our institution’s open access outlay as well as apprise researchers of their options for selecting OA publication venues based on APCs and impact metrics. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Harlan, L., & Rigby, M. (2024). Open Secrets: Exploring Institutional Spending on Open Access. International Journal of Librarianship, 9(4), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2024.vol9.4.394 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2024.vol9.4.394 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/30382 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Chinese American Librarians Association (CALA) | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | |
| dc.subject | Open Access | |
| dc.subject | Article Processing Charge | |
| dc.subject | Impact Metrics | |
| dc.subject | Data Visualization | |
| dc.subject | Library Expenditures | |
| dc.subject | Institutional Spending | |
| dc.title | Open Secrets: Exploring Institutional Spending on Open Access |