Oregon Law Review : Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 763-794 : Notes of the 1991 Advisory Committee for the Amendment of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45: Is the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBagnall, George James, V
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-31T19:03:12Z
dc.date.available2007-07-31T19:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description32 p.en
dc.format.extent122959 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citation83 Or. L. Rev. 763 (2004)en
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/4625
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 763-794 : Notes of the 1991 Advisory Committee for the Amendment of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45: Is the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking?en
dc.title.alternativeNotes of the 1991 Advisory Committee for the Amendment of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45: Is the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking?en
dc.title.alternativeIs the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking?en
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
83_2_763.pdf
Size:
120.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.21 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Oregon Law Review : Vol. 83, No. 2 (2004)
Works by the Law Students